wealth of a country: Gross self esteem indicator

The wealth of a prosperous society or country is measured by gross esteem indicator (self worth).

The so called first world countries have comparatively lower rate of eligible voters actually voting.
Are they lazy ?

vs

the poor countries, such as Nepal, where every one seems to have ample “time” to vote and believe in spending a day waiting in line to “vote”.
Are they smart ?

My take is:

In USA: most people try to make change happen (with or without voting). So most don’t feel voting is that special.

In Nepal:most people have too low self esteem to make change happen (so they vote — to increase their self esteem)

Voting raises their self confidence in themself, and maybe make change)

In essence a story between high self esteem and low self esteem

Gross self esteem indicator, anyone ?

Ujw

From my trip to Mustang !

Tourism is a real deal in Nepal . I am up for it.

so thats why I made www.exoticbuddha.com for travellers !

create wealth…stop finding out causes of poverty.

well thats the concept.

simple. Wealth is something to be created. Poverty is an idle state. It is the state that people naturally are in. Don’t analyse it. It is a state in which people normally stay in. No more. Stop.

Instead of “launching programs to find where poverty is coming from”, we should concentrate on creating wealth (enlarge the pie). Instead of World Bank giving “millions of dollars” to poor countries like Nepal find out root causes of poverty, just forget it.

Concentrate on giving people opportunities to generate wealth by doing what the rich countries did. produce and supply service and products to generate more wealth.
and btw pulling the rich down by redistributing their wealth doesn’t help. We should instead try to figure out how they created wealth and make more like them.

Damn good read.

“excerpts from Seth Godin” www.sethgodin.com

I love his intuitve common sense!

and a good article to download.

.and your clicks for free (the new ebook)

Excerpt:

“For the last two months I’ve been working away on a (short) ebook about traffic. Traffic to your blog or your company site. It has evolved quite a bit, and ended up using Squidoo lenses as a template for the point I was trying to make.

There’s an enormous amount of superstition about what makes some pages rank high while others languish. When you look at the actual figures, though, much of that fades away.

It turns out that the new playing field enforced by the search engines is eliminating many of the shortcuts that used to be effective. In other words, the best way is the long way.

The long way is to create content that is updated, unique and useful. Again and again we see that sites that do all three manage to get more than their fair share of traffic. So, I guess the title of the ebook is a bit misleading. The clicks don’t cost money, but they do take effort. That’s good news for people who have more talent than cash. I hope you’ll find it useful, whether or not you use Squidoo.Click here to start the PDF download. A good way to bring traffic to your website The book is free to post or share.”

thanks Seth Godin.

small =good, big = bad .. small, agile, fast, dynamic.

more people = more indecision
more = bad

less is good
less interference, less subsidies, less people, small teams do better than big big big teams.

From government to businesses…